From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Ken Chen <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
balducci@units.it, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 16:27:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070301162716.81a53b64.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45E7658A.9060309@redhat.com>
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:45:14 -0500
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Problem description at:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8048
> >
> > Commit b18ec80396834497933d77b81ec0918519f4e2a7
> > [PATCH] sched: improve migration accuracy
> > optimized the scheduler time calculations, but broke posix-cpu-timers.
> >
> > The problem is that the p->last_ran value is not updated after a context
> > switch. So a subsequent call to current_sched_time() calculates with a
> > stale p->last_ran value, i.e. accounts the full time, which the task was
> > scheduled away.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -3566,7 +3566,7 @@ switch_tasks:
> >
> > sched_info_switch(prev, next);
> > if (likely(prev != next)) {
> > - next->timestamp = now;
> > + next->timestamp = next->last_ran = now;
> > rq->nr_switches++;
> > rq->curr = next;
> > ++*switch_count;
> >
>
> Is this going to be merged or not??
It just hit mainline.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-02 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070221104747.3cb0da32.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-02-22 0:33 ` [PATCH] Fix posix-cpu-timer breakage caused by stale p->last_ran value Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-22 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-22 8:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-22 9:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-03-01 23:45 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-03-02 0:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] <fa.5d4W3Gwb5Gw7ztDfk2utJt1zgjc@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.cIP2OCge0gIF8cSETEmZ9D2dxpE@ifi.uio.no>
2007-02-22 16:49 ` John
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070301162716.81a53b64.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balducci@units.it \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox