From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965565AbXCBUfQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:35:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965585AbXCBUfQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:35:16 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56614 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965565AbXCBUfP (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:35:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:35:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070302.123514.35465791.davem@davemloft.net> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: romosan@sycorax.lbl.gov, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, rpurdie@rpsys.net Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2 radeon backlight From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20070302122920.a2967ebf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070301184531.b3aeafe3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <87tzx35zkc.fsf@sycorax.lbl.gov> <20070302122920.a2967ebf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:29:20 -0800 > On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:24:03 -0800 > Alex Romosan wrote: > > > Andrew Morton writes: > > > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:32:43 -0800 > > > Alex Romosan wrote: > > > > > >> the backlight on my thinkpad still (2.6.20 worked fine) doesn't come > > >> on if i have the radeon backlight enabled. without it, i guess it's > > >> the ibm acpi modules that controls the backlight and it seems to work > > >> fine. > > >> > > > > > > Unclear. Are you saying that the backlight comes on OK if you use > > > the IBM acpi module? > > > > yes, if i disable the radeon backlight and use the ibm acpi module, > > than the backlight works. if i enable the radeon backlight, the screen > > stays dark and i can't turn it on (i tried using radeontool to control > > it but nothing happened). > > Richard, is this actually a bug, or is it a config error or something like that? > > And should we track it as a post-2.6.20 regression? Why don't we compromise for 2.6.21 by marking the Radeon backlight stuff EXPERIMENTAL until the cases where IBM ACPI works and the Radeon backlight stuff does not are worked out?