From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1030198AbXCBVq7@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1030198AbXCBVq7 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:46:59 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030359AbXCBVq7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:46:59 -0500
Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:56056 "EHLO
	vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1030198AbXCBVq6 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:46:58 -0500
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 21:46:43 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
       Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Message-ID: <20070302214643.GA10774@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <45D5EA88.7090300@redhat.com> <45D6DDCE.5050803@assembler.cz> <45D7461A.2040808@redhat.com> <20070218183805.5a4fd813.khali@linux-fr.org> <20070228213803.GA4877@ucw.cz> <20070301152655.f232db64.khali@linux-fr.org> <20070302114023.GD2163@elf.ucw.cz> <20070302150313.198b6053.khali@linux-fr.org> <20070302145709.GA3710@srcf.ucam.org> <20070302224155.143b8643.khali@linux-fr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070302224155.143b8643.khali@linux-fr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:35:45 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vavatch.codon.org.uk)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:41:55PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:

> I like the patch, after adding some casts to the printf args it
> compiles fine. However you print warnings each time a resource has been
> reserved... without checking if it hasn't been reserved by ACPI itself!
> My machine looks like this:

Oops! I'll look into fixing that. Thanks, that's an excellent point...

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org