From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030501AbXCBWAI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:00:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030502AbXCBWAI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:00:08 -0500 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:42400 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030501AbXCBWAF (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:00:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:58:34 -0800 From: Bill Irwin To: Adam Litke Cc: Bill Irwin , linux-kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with shm namespace cleanups Message-ID: <20070302215834.GM10643@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Irwin , Adam Litke , linux-kernel , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org References: <1172693610.12805.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070302000808.GE10643@holomorphy.com> <1172852957.12220.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1172852957.12220.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:08 -0800, Bill Irwin wrote: >> Looks like I should grab these testcases for the sake of due diligence >> (not to say I intend to alter maintenance style from primarily review, >> approval, and bugfixing, not that I've been doing as much of any of those >> as I should). To which architectures and/or distributions have the >> userspace bits been ported, or otherwise run/tested on? A quick sniff >> test on an Altix suggests SLES and/or ia64 may trip up the scripts: On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:29:16AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: > Right now we support x86, powerpc, and x86_64. Segment remapping and > hugetlb malloc won't work on ia64 until long format vhpt is supported (I > suspect). But the test framework should be adaptable to other > architectures. Those patches have been around for a while. I'll ping Tony Luck et al about that since I'm not entirely aware of what their issues might be. I should probably get some testing in on sparc64 at some point, too. -- wli