Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

Paul Menage
2007-03-08T01:36:11Z

On 3/7/07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> Pretty much. For most of the other cases I think we are safe referring
> to them as resource controls or resource limits. I know that roughly covers
> what cpusets and beancounters and ckrm currently do.

Plus resource monitoring (which may often be a subset of resource
control/limits).

>
> The real trick is that I believe these groupings are designed to be something
> you can setup on login and then not be able to switch out of.

That's going to to be the case for most resource controllers - is that
the case for namespaces? (e.g. can any task unshare say its mount
namespace?)

Paul