Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies

Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06T23:43:50Z

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:36:55PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
>
> > OK, what about the patch below?
>
> How many goats did you have to sacrifice to get that to work?

I'd say it was quite straightforward. :-)

> I like it with
> just one very minor niggle: if CONFIG_BLOCK=y, CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y then the CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
> configuration item disappears and reappears depending on the state of
> CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD. But, as I said, it's a very minor niggle.
>...

I've also seen this, but I didn't find any way to solve this, and
cosmetical issues only visible with CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y are nothing I'm
that much worried about.

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed