Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies

David Howells
2007-03-05T13:39:17Z

Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:

> OK, what about the patch below?

How many goats did you have to sacrifice to get that to work? I like it with
just one very minor niggle: if CONFIG_BLOCK=y, CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y
CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y then the CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
configuration item disappears and reappears depending on the state of
CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD. But, as I said, it's a very minor niggle.

Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>