Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-06T00:56:28Z

On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:38 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I'm not done with my bisection, but e9e2cdb4 is among the 28 commits left,
> > so I'm pretty sure I'm hitting the same bug. I'll do a few more bootups to
> > be 100% sure.
>
> Ok, it's in the last six candidates, so yeah, I'm pretty sure. I'll do a
> final compile/boot cycle to verify, but if you don't hear from me, you can
> pretty much assume that was it.
>
> Thomas, Ingo, I'd _really_ like to get -rc3 out there, but I'd like to cut
> down the regression list a bit, and a number of them were about resume
> from RAM, and this is probably it. So I'd *really* like to get this one
> nailed, especially since the causing commit is known. Can you look at it
> as a high-priority thing, please?

Sure. I fought it all day. Can you please test the patch I sent a couple
of minutes ago ? Would be great to have your feedback tomorrow morning.

We need to fix that ACPI problem (acpi_processor_start is not called
when CPU#1 is resumed) as well. I look into this tomorrow unless Len
beats me.

tglx