From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965131AbXCEN2s (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:28:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965267AbXCEN2s (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:28:48 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52622 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965131AbXCEN2r (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:28:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:28:20 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Avi Kivity Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roland McGrath , Andi Kleen , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential Message-ID: <20070305142820.GD22829@bingen.suse.de> References: <20070305120631.GA14105@elte.hu> <45EC0EB7.7080300@qumranet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45EC0EB7.7080300@qumranet.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Can't paravirt patch the syscall instruction like it does the rest of > the kernel? The problem is not the syscall instruction, but some problem with the way the vDSO mapping is set up with CONFIG_PARAVIRT that broke older glibc. -Andi