From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933029AbXCEPZp (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:25:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932966AbXCEPZo (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:25:44 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60306 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932914AbXCEPZn (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:25:43 -0500 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Joerg Roedel" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86_64: add reporting of SVM flags to /proc/cpuinfo Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:25:31 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070305143601.GF30318@amd.com> <20070305143911.GG30318@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <20070305143911.GG30318@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703051625.31449.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 05 March 2007 15:39, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Joerg Roedel > > This patch adds the advanced SVM reporting to /proc/cpuinfo on the x86_64 > architecture. Adding more fields to /proc/cpuinfo is always somewhat risky because there are lots of badly written parsers for it. I considered adding the SVM fields myself, but decided against it because it didn't seem generally useful enough. -Andi