From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, rol@as2917.net,
"'Adrian Bunk'" <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: 2.6.21-rc2 : Oops in rtc_cmos...
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:23:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703061423.42118.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070306215023.1ec0a4d7@inspiron>
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 12:50 pm, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 11:32:28 -0800
> David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > > on then... My dmesg says, related to rtc :
> > >
> > > ...
> > > rtc_cmos 00:03: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
> >
> > I think the RTC core shouldn't emit this message; I'll send
> > a patch. It's just confusing on error paths; and on success
> > paths it's less informative than a message from the driver
> > itself could be.
>
> I would like a way to have a common "welcome" message among
> all the drivers. Please take this into account if you want
> to send a patch ;)
Well, I already sent such a patch. :)
I don't much object to such a message, although it's not
necessary ... and "not necessary" is all but synonymous
with being syslog spam.
> > > What does this all mean ? I thought an RTC Cmos was always there on a
> > > standard PC motherboard... (that's why I had activated the option in the
> > > first time).
> >
> > You enabled CONFIG_RTC (under char drivers, "Enhanced Real Time Clock Support")
> > so that driver has claimed the CMOS RTC instead of "rtc-cmos.c". Disable it.
> > Then you'll be able to use this driver with no little surprises.
>
> maybe we should consider this in the Kconfig.
Kconfig for both drivers, ideally: select one, the other becomes unavailable.
Someone could generate such a patch...
- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-06 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-04 18:43 2.6.21-rc2 : Oops in rtc_cmos Paul Rolland
2007-03-04 23:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06 7:29 ` Paul Rolland
2007-03-06 19:32 ` David Brownell
2007-03-06 20:50 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2007-03-06 22:23 ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-03-07 4:42 ` Paul Rolland
2007-03-07 5:26 ` David Brownell
2007-03-07 8:16 ` Alessandro Zummo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703061423.42118.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rol@as2917.net \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox