From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422638AbXCGJIZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:08:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422639AbXCGJIY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:08:24 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:57746 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422638AbXCGJIV (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Mar 2007 04:08:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:07:56 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: mingo@elte.hu, npiggin@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes nonlinear) Message-Id: <20070307010756.b31c8190.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20070221023656.6306.246.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20070221023735.6306.83373.sendpatchset@linux.site> <20070306225101.f393632c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070307070853.GB15877@wotan.suse.de> <20070307081948.GA9563@wotan.suse.de> <20070307082755.GA25733@elte.hu> <20070307004709.432ddf97.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:51:57 +0100 Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > Dirty page accounting doesn't work either on > > > non-linear mappings > > > > It doesn't? Confused - these things don't have anything to do with each > > other do they? > > Look in page_mkclean(). Where does it handle non-linear mappings? > OK, I'd forgotten about that. It won't break dirty memory accounting, but it'll potentially break dirty memory balancing. If we have the wrong page (due to nonlinear), page_check_address() will fail and we'll leave the pte dirty. That puts us back to the pre-2.6.17 algorithms and I guess it'll break the msync guarantees. Peter, I thought we went through the nonlinear problem ages ago and decided it was OK?