public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:21:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070307062157.GJ943@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070306175504.GW3441@stusta.de>

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:55:04PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:22PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >This patch contains the scheduled removal of the OBSOLETE_OSS options 
> > >for 2.6.22.
> > >
> > If these are drivers for which there are thought to be useful ALSA 
> > drivers, would it be reasonable to leave a stub for a help file naming 
> > the driver which claims to support the hardware?
> > 
> > I'm not objection to the removal of the drivers, just noting that 
> > identifying the new drivers can be made easier.
> 
> People compiling their own kernels aren't completely dumb - if you know 
> about people having problems finding the right ALSA driver for their 
> hardware, please name the concrete problems so that we can improve the 
> description and/or help text of these ALSA options.

Real problem is that we can expect several "sound does not work anymore"
because people doing "make oldconfig" will get no warning at all about
the removed options. Remember people complaining about keyboard not working ?
Perhaps the real problem is more Kconfig than OSS, but it would be fine if
we found a solution to enumerate the list of options which have been removed
when they do their make oldconfig.

Regards,
Willy


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-07  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-05  1:49 [2.6.22 patch] the scheduled removal of OBSOLETE_OSS options Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06 17:46 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-06 17:55   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06 23:03     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-03-07  6:21     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2007-03-07 19:56       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-07 20:48         ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-07 20:01       ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070307062157.GJ943@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox