From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
To: <rol@as2917.net>
Cc: "'David Brownell'" <david-b@pacbell.net>,
"'Adrian Bunk'" <bunk@stusta.de>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<a.zummo@towertech.it>, <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2 : Oops in rtc_cmos...
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 09:16:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070307091603.717dae82@inspiron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <051e01c76072$fcdae290$4b00a8c0@donald>
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 05:42:13 +0100
"Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > > Yes, it does, so it's a Good One (tm),
> >
> > And points out that $SUBJECT is misleading; the root cause of
> > the oops isn't rtc_cmos. Workaround, don't enable the legacy
> > driver for this hardware.
>
> Well, sorry for that, but my point was that without enabling
> CONFIG_DRV_RTC_CMOS and only using CONFIG_RTC, my dmesg says :
>
> drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
yep. the layer the copies the hw clock to the system clock
is saying that it cannot find any driver to work on. so
you made the correct move in searching a driver. :)
> > > drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0)
> > Because probing 00:03 failed, was never fully usable.
> > So then rtc0 couldn't be found. You'd get the same
> > message if, say, the RTC was loaded as a module.
>
> It seems to me that the DRV_RTC_CMOS and the "standard" CONFIG_RTC
> shouldn't be used at the same time... Am I correct on that ?
> Wouldn't it be better to have this dependancy enforced ?
I will try to push a patch asap.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-07 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-04 18:43 2.6.21-rc2 : Oops in rtc_cmos Paul Rolland
2007-03-04 23:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-03-06 7:29 ` Paul Rolland
2007-03-06 19:32 ` David Brownell
2007-03-06 20:50 ` [rtc-linux] " Alessandro Zummo
2007-03-06 22:23 ` David Brownell
2007-03-07 4:42 ` Paul Rolland
2007-03-07 5:26 ` David Brownell
2007-03-07 8:16 ` Alessandro Zummo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070307091603.717dae82@inspiron \
--to=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rol@as2917.net \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox