public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@analog.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-core: i2c bitbang gpio structure
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:45:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703090945.38880.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070309175540.6bb22798.khali@linux-fr.org>

On Friday 09 March 2007 8:55 am, Jean Delvare wrote:

> > +struct i2c_bitbang_gpio {
> > +	int sda;
> > +	int scl;
> > +};
> 
> ...
> 
> Also, this structure alone isn't very useful. I'm waiting to see
> drivers actually making use of it before I will consider merging this
> patch at all.

The notion would be that we could have one i2c bitbanger using
the CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO <asm/gpio.h> interfaces that could work
on most platforms, using that struct for platform_data and the
usual convention for platform device naming.

I'd expect that struct would be merged as part of such a generic
GPIO bitbang driver, and would only be used by that one driver.

SPI could use such a generic bitbanger too.  Until 2.6.21 it's
been missing that last step:  it's needed platform-specific
GPIO calls, so the bitbangers were generic except for those
lowest-level hooks.

- Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-09 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09 10:13 [PATCH] i2c-core: i2c bitbang gpio structure Wu, Bryan
2007-03-09 16:55 ` Jean Delvare
2007-03-09 17:45   ` David Brownell [this message]
2007-03-09 18:48     ` [PATCH] Bitbanging i2c bus driver using the GPIO API Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-09 19:30       ` David Brownell
2007-03-09 20:08         ` Russell King
2007-03-09 21:17           ` David Brownell
2007-03-09 20:43         ` Håvard Skinnemoen
2007-03-09 21:45           ` David Brownell
2007-03-10 13:13             ` [PATCH v2] " Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-10 20:15               ` Jean Delvare
2007-03-11  4:31                 ` David Brownell
2007-03-12 14:11                 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-11  4:02               ` David Brownell
2007-03-12 10:07               ` Wu, Bryan
2007-03-12 14:34                 ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-12 14:53                   ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-12 15:11                     ` Jean Delvare
2007-03-12 15:30                       ` Haavard Skinnemoen
2007-03-10 19:15         ` [PATCH] " Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703090945.38880.david-b@pacbell.net \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bryan.wu@analog.com \
    --cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox