Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

Paul Menage
2007-03-07T17:47:50Z

On 3/7/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Quoting Srivatsa Vaddagiri (vatsa@in.ibm.com):
> > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:32:07PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > I'm not really sure that I see the value of having this be part of
> > > nsproxy rather than the previous independent container (and
> > > container_group) structure.
> >
> > *shrug*
> >
> > I wrote the patch mainly to see whether the stuff container folks (Sam Vilain
> > et al) were complaining abt (that container structure abstraction
> > inside the kernel is redundant/unnecessary) made sense or not.
>
> I still think the complaint was about terminology, not implementation.

No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource
controllers hook off.

Paul