public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:31:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309223152.GA1407@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703100912.07792.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 09:12:07AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
(...)
> > Matt, could you check with plain 2.6.20 + Con's patch ? It is possible
> > that he added bugs when porting to -mm, or that someting in -mm causes
> > the trouble. Your experience with -mm seems so much different from mine
> > with mainline, there must be a difference somewhere !
> 
> Good idea.

OK, so let me summarize :

  plain 2.6.20
  + http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.20.2.bz2
  + http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/sched-rsdl-0.26.patch
  + http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117347544926731&q=raw

should be a good starting point.

> > Con, is your patch necessary for mainline patch too ? I see that it
> > should apply, but sometimes -mm may justify changes.
> 
> Yes it will be necessary for the mainline patch too.

OK Thanks Con.

Best regards,
Willy


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-09 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-09  5:39 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  6:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09  7:53   ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:20     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:39       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 18:27         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:15           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:26             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 20:51               ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:55             ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 20:46         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:07           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:19             ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:39               ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 21:57                 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:18                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:29                     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 23:02                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 23:06                         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  0:31                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  0:34                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  0:49                         ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  1:28                           ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  1:42                             ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  2:10                               ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-10  2:20                               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  2:26                                 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10  2:53                                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:57                 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-09 22:12                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 22:20                     ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09 22:31                     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2007-03-10  1:02                     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10  1:10                       ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-10 17:01             ` James Cloos
2007-03-10 23:16               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 12:38                 ` James Cloos
2007-03-11 12:52                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09 21:10           ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-09  8:36     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-09  9:07       ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09  9:49         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-09 10:36           ` Serge Belyshev
2007-03-09 18:07             ` Mark Lord
2007-03-09 18:24               ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-09 20:23               ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 18:21                 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-10 23:34                   ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-10 23:38                     ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 18:21                     ` Mark Lord
2007-03-13 20:26                       ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-13 22:06                         ` Mark Lord

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070309223152.GA1407@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox