From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767575AbXCIWci (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:32:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767574AbXCIWci (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:32:38 -0500 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:1091 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767575AbXCIWcg (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 17:32:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:31:52 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Con Kolivas Cc: Matt Mackall , linux-kernel , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc3-mm1 RSDL results Message-ID: <20070309223152.GA1407@1wt.eu> References: <20070309053931.GA10459@waste.org> <20070309213959.GI10394@waste.org> <20070309215716.GK943@1wt.eu> <200703100912.07792.kernel@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703100912.07792.kernel@kolivas.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 09:12:07AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: (...) > > Matt, could you check with plain 2.6.20 + Con's patch ? It is possible > > that he added bugs when porting to -mm, or that someting in -mm causes > > the trouble. Your experience with -mm seems so much different from mine > > with mainline, there must be a difference somewhere ! > > Good idea. OK, so let me summarize : plain 2.6.20 + http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/patch-2.6.20.2.bz2 + http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/sched-rsdl-0.26.patch + http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=117347544926731&q=raw should be a good starting point. > > Con, is your patch necessary for mainline patch too ? I see that it > > should apply, but sometimes -mm may justify changes. > > Yes it will be necessary for the mainline patch too. OK Thanks Con. Best regards, Willy