From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767626AbXCIXLf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:11:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767629AbXCIXLf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:11:35 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46205 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767626AbXCIXLe (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:11:34 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:10:41 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Zachary Amsden Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , akpm@linux-foundation.org, LKML , Rusty Russell , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , Alan Cox Subject: Re: ABI coupling to hypervisors via CONFIG_PARAVIRT Message-ID: <20070309231041.GA712@elte.hu> References: <20070309180230.GA17988@elte.hu> <20070309192420.GA27747@elte.hu> <20070309201257.GA5761@elte.hu> <20070309213607.GA16796@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070309213607.GA16796@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar wrote: > [...] If that is the case then my ABI worries would indeed be wrong > and i'd owe Zach a big fat apology [and more] for my flames ;-) that apology i very much owe to Zach no matter what the outcome of the discussion. Zach, some of my mindless characterisations of the quality of VMI code (and of your intentions) were really out of bound and were unfair, and i'd like to apologize for that :-/ Ingo