From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use attribute groups in struct device_type
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:12:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703100212.05770.dtor@insightbb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070310065556.GB20302@suse.de>
On Saturday 10 March 2007 01:55, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:54:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > Please consider applying the patch below. It switches struct device_type
> > > to using attribute groups which os more flexible. I am using it in my
> > > input class_device -> device conversion (which is 99% done btw).
> >
> > Argh, I never sent you my version of that, did I? Very sorry about
> > that, I was working on fixing up the device namespace issue first, which
> > isn't done yet :(
> >
> > Anyway, my patch that did that is below, feel free to use it or not if
> > you want.
> >
> > > I looked through -mm and the latest git and there does not seem to be
> > > any users of struct device_type yet...
> >
> > Yes, the input patch below uses it and I have a block-device patch from
> > Kay in my tree that Andrew doesn't pull from (as it's usually really
> > messed up and I know to hide this kind of breakage from him...)
>
> Oops, that patch didn't use it, this follow-on patch from Kay uses them.
>
Ok, so input portion in your tree does not use type->attrs so we don't
have a conflict here. Unless my patch messes up Kay's blockdev patch
badly I'd like you to accept it. Input uses 3 attribute groups and I
don't want to open-code their creation/removal.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-10 6:37 [PATCH] Use attribute groups in struct device_type Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-10 6:54 ` Greg KH
2007-03-10 6:55 ` Greg KH
2007-03-10 7:12 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2007-03-10 7:22 ` Greg KH
2007-03-10 14:27 ` Kay Sievers
2007-03-26 4:45 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703100212.05770.dtor@insightbb.com \
--to=dtor@insightbb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).