From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933458AbXCJN4O (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:56:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933455AbXCJN4O (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:56:14 -0500 Received: from allen.werkleitz.de ([80.190.251.108]:54076 "EHLO allen.werkleitz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767017AbXCJN4M (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 08:56:12 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:53:12 +0100 From: Johannes Stezenbach To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: Ingo Molnar , Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jens Axboe , Jeff Chua , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, luming.yu@intel.com, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , Konstantin Karasyov , Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Thomas Meyer , Meelis Roos , Alexey Starikovskiy , Janosch Machowinski , vladimir.p.lebedev@intel.com, Ash Milsted , dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Message-ID: <20070310135312.GA7659@linuxtv.org> References: <20070305015034.GG3441@stusta.de> <20070308123143.GF5149@mellanox.co.il> <20070308192554.GA2999@elte.hu> <20070308230705.GA4611@elte.hu> <20070309174821.GA31754@linuxtv.org> <20070309233508.GB2197@elf.ucw.cz> <20070310090121.GB15647@elte.hu> <20070310114301.GA30554@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070310114301.GA30554@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 87.162.126.141 Subject: Re: [2/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on allen.werkleitz.de) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 12:43:01PM +0100, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:01:21AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > i'm wondering, do you have any idea how Windows handles the > > suspend/resume quirks problem area? Do they "curse BIOS vendors and > > maintain a large DB of DMI-driven exceptions", or do they perhaps have > > some fundamentally better approach than us? If it's the former, then we > > might as well try to bring more automatism (and more of your database) > > into the kernel itself. > > I think that in windows, you simply install the "HP nx$FOOBAR intel graphics > driver" on a nx$FOOBAR machine, and the "ASUS $FOOBAR ATI graphics driver" > on an ASUS $FOOBAR machine etc. Those drivers are mostly stock intel/ATI/ > whoever drivers, but with the little bit of extra knowledge on how to wake > up the graphics chip. That's also what the thinkwiki page suggests. It says: "Affected Operating Systems: * Linux, all flavours. * Windows, for some models as well (only when using non-IBM drivers). * FreeBSD (on the A22M)" Johannes