From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: RSDL-mm 0.28
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:19:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703111719.38514.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070311040305.GT10394@waste.org>
On Sunday 11 March 2007 15:03, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:01:32PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:28:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > Ok I don't think there's any actual accounting problem here per se
> > > (although I did just recently post a bugfix for rsdl however I think
> > > that's unrelated). What I think is going on in the ccache testcase is
> > > that all the work is being offloaded to kernel threads reading/writing
> > > to/from the filesystem and the make is not getting any actual cpu
> > > time.
> >
> > I don't see significant system time while this is happening.
>
> Also, it's running pretty much entirely out of page cache so there
> wouldn't be a whole lot for kernel threads to do.
Well I can't reproduce that behaviour here at all whether from disk or the
pagecache with ccache, so I'm not entirely sure what's different at your end.
However both you and the other person reporting bad behaviour were using ATI
drivers. That's about the only commonality? I wonder if they do need to
yield... somewhat instead of not at all.
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-11 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 1:35 RSDL-mm 0.28 Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 2:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-11 3:59 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 4:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 4:03 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 6:19 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2007-03-12 5:38 ` RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29 Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 5:48 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 6:37 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 10:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 12:51 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 18:28 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:46 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:10 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 19:14 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-12 19:43 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:54 ` Patrick Mau
2007-03-12 20:24 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 1:32 ` Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29) Douglas McNaught
2007-03-13 2:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 3:01 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-03-13 4:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 4:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-13 5:48 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 13:22 ` RSDL-mm 0.28 David Schwartz
2007-03-12 14:54 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-13 7:22 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-11 7:32 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703111719.38514.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox