From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amanda-hackers@amanda.org
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:38:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703120138.37667.gene.heskett@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703111719.38514.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sunday 11 March 2007, Con Kolivas wrote:
>On Sunday 11 March 2007 15:03, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:01:32PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:28:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>> > > Ok I don't think there's any actual accounting problem here per se
>> > > (although I did just recently post a bugfix for rsdl however I
>> > > think that's unrelated). What I think is going on in the ccache
>> > > testcase is that all the work is being offloaded to kernel threads
>> > > reading/writing to/from the filesystem and the make is not getting
>> > > any actual cpu time.
>> >
>> > I don't see significant system time while this is happening.
>>
>> Also, it's running pretty much entirely out of page cache so there
>> wouldn't be a whole lot for kernel threads to do.
>
>Well I can't reproduce that behaviour here at all whether from disk or
> the pagecache with ccache, so I'm not entirely sure what's different at
> your end. However both you and the other person reporting bad behaviour
> were using ATI drivers. That's about the only commonality? I wonder if
> they do need to yield... somewhat instead of not at all.
I hate to say it Con, but this one seems to have broken the amanda-tar
symbiosis.
I haven't tried a plain 21-rc3, so the problem may exist there, and in
fact it did for 21-rc1, but I don't recall if it was true for -rc2. But
I will have a plain 21-rc3 running by tomorrow nights amanda run to test.
What happens is that when amanda tells tar to do a level 1 or 2, tar still
thinks its doing a level 0. The net result is that the tape is filled
completely and amanda does an EOT exit in about 10 of my 42 dle's. This
is tar-1.15-1 for fedora core 6.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
While it may be true that a watched pot never boils, the one you don't
keep an eye on can make an awful mess of your stove.
-- Edward Stevenson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-11 1:35 RSDL-mm 0.28 Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 2:28 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-11 3:59 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 3:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-11 3:44 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-11 4:01 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 4:03 ` Matt Mackall
2007-03-11 6:19 ` Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 5:38 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2007-03-12 5:48 ` RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29 Con Kolivas
2007-03-12 6:37 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 10:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 12:51 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 18:28 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 18:46 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:10 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 19:14 ` Lee Revell
2007-03-12 19:43 ` Douglas McNaught
2007-03-12 19:54 ` Patrick Mau
2007-03-12 20:24 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 1:32 ` Stracing Amanda (was: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29) Douglas McNaught
2007-03-13 2:39 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 3:01 ` Nish Aravamudan
2007-03-13 4:04 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-13 4:45 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-03-13 5:48 ` Gene Heskett
2007-03-12 13:22 ` RSDL-mm 0.28 David Schwartz
2007-03-12 14:54 ` Ray Lee
2007-03-13 7:22 ` Nick Piggin
2007-03-11 7:32 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703120138.37667.gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--to=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amanda-hackers@amanda.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox