From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Vincent Fortier <vincent.fortier1@ec.gc.ca>,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RSDL v0.30 cpu scheduler for ... 2.6.18.8 kernel
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:45:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703121545.06379.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703120417.57761.vincent.fortier1@ec.gc.ca>
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:17, Vincent Fortier wrote:
> > There are updated patches for 2.6.20, 2.6.20.2, 2.6.21-rc3 and
> > 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 to bring RSDL up to version 0.30 for download here:
> >
> > Full patches:
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.30.p
> >at ch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.2-rsdl-0.30.patch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc3-sched-rsdl-0.
> >30 .patch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc3-mm2-rsdl-0.30
> >.p atch
> >
> > incrementals:
> >
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/2.6.20.2-rsdl-0.2
> >9- 0.30.patch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20.2/2.6.20.2-rsdl-0
> >.2 9-0.30.patch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc3/2.6.21-rc3-rs
> >dl -0.29-0.30.patch
> > http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc3-mm2/2.6.21-rc
> >3- mm2-rsdl-0.29-0.30.patch
> And here are the backported RSDL 0.30 patches in case any of you would
> still be running an older 2.6.18.8 kernel ...
Thanks, your efforts are appreciated as it would take me quite a while to do a
variety of backports that people are already requesting.
> Just for info, verison 0.30 seems around 2 seconds faster than 0.26-0.29
> versions at boot time. I used to have around 2-3 seconds of difference
> between a vanilla and a rsdl patched kernel. Now it looks more like 5
> seconds faster! Wow.. nice work CK!
>
> 2.6.18.8 vanilla kernel:
> [ 68.514248] ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
> 2.6.18.8-rsdl-0.30:
> [ 63.739337] ACPI: Power Button (CM) [PWRB]
Indeed there's almost 5 seconds difference there. To be honest, the boot time
speedups are an unexpected bonus, but everyone seems to be reporting them on
all flavours so perhaps all those timeout related driver setups are
inadvertently benefiting.
> - vin
Thanks
--
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8E8F647D7835334B985D069AE964A4F7028FE62A@ECQCMTLMAIL1.quebec.int.ec.gc.ca>
2007-03-12 8:17 ` RSDL v0.30 cpu scheduler for ... 2.6.18.8 kernel Vincent Fortier
2007-03-12 4:45 ` Con Kolivas [this message]
[not found] ` <200703121221.28912.mgd@technosis.de>
[not found] ` <200703122232.54919.kernel@kolivas.org>
2007-03-12 13:54 ` [ck] " Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
2007-03-12 10:40 ` Paul Rolland
2007-03-12 13:09 ` Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703121545.06379.kernel@kolivas.org \
--to=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.fortier1@ec.gc.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox