Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!

Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-03-08T11:34:16Z

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:16:00PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I think implementation wise this tends to make sense.
> However it should have nothing to do with semantics.
>
> If we have a lot of independent resource controllers. Placing the
> pointer to their data structures directly in nsproxy instead of in
> task_struct sounds like a reasonable idea

Thats what the rcfs patches do.

> but it should not be user visible.

What do you mean by this? We do want the user to be able to manipulate
the resource parameters (which are normally present in the data
structures/resource objects pointed to by nsproxy -
nsproxy->ctlr_data[])

--
Regards,
vatsa