From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933175AbXCNUVd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:21:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933156AbXCNUVd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:21:33 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:48880 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933226AbXCNUVc (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:21:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:21:31 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , Glauber de Oliveira Costa Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] Make common x86 arch area for i386 and x86_64 - Take 2 Message-ID: <20070314202131.GC376@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070314050819.536207642@goodmis.org> <20070314125330.GA13168@elte.hu> <20070314180933.GA12994@elte.hu> <20070314195916.GA5674@elte.hu> <20070314201156.GA9603@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070314201156.GA9603@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > also, having the x32_ and x64_ prefix is a painful daily reminder for > all of us changing the architecture that 'this stuff needs to be > unified!'. We would probably stuck with that forever and it just looks ugly. Non paravirt xen uses such a setup and I always hated it. Besides the architecture is called x86_64 I don't see a problem with step by step unifying what makes sense in the current setup. -Andi