public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eranian@hpl.hp.com,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:32:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070316083252.GA21418@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45F9D5DD.8040909@goop.org>


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Subject: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
> 
> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete 
> duplicates of the same logic.  This patch combines them by 
> implementing them in terms of the more general 
> smp_call_function_mask().

> +	/* Send a message to other CPUs */
> +	if (cpus_equal(mask, allbutself))
> +		send_IPI_allbutself(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
> +	else
> +		send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);

this is a bit ugly, but i guess we cannot do much about it - the 
hardware side handles this in a bit assymetric way too.

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-16  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-13  1:12 [PATCH] i386: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 19:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 19:15   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 19:33     ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-15 19:39       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 20:55         ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 20:16           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-15 23:25   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-16  8:32     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-03-16 11:26     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070316083252.GA21418@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox