From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753457AbXCSLbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753466AbXCSLbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:57233 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753457AbXCSLbX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:31:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:31:08 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Pekka J Enberg Cc: ast@domdv.de, clameter@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: deal with NULL pointers passed to kmem_cache_free Message-Id: <20070319033108.b51bed63.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:27:18 +0200 (EET) Pekka J Enberg wrote: > From: Pekka Enberg > > This changes kmem_cache_free() to deal with NULL objects passed to it. The > current behavior is inconsistent with kfree() so there are callers > passing NULL to kmem_cache_free(). err, we don't want to do this, do we? It adds overhead for something which we've carefully taught all our programmers to not do. The only known code which will benefit from this is buggy. > Andreas, can you please confirm this fixes the oops you reported on > linux-scsi? s/fix/hide/