From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752611AbXCUGbr (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:31:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752604AbXCUGbr (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:31:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:50486 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611AbXCUGbp (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:31:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:31:09 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Pavel Machek , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: Fix SNAPSHOT_S2RAM ioctl Message-Id: <20070320223109.7158eb9e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200703202248.08665.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200703202248.08665.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:48:08 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > The SNAPSHOT_S2RAM ioctl does not disable the nonboot CPUs before entering > the suspend, although it should do this. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > --- > kernel/power/user.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc4/kernel/power/user.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.21-rc4.orig/kernel/power/user.c > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4/kernel/power/user.c > @@ -374,9 +374,12 @@ static int snapshot_ioctl(struct inode * > if (error) { > printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to suspend some devices.\n"); > } else { > - /* Enter S3, system is already frozen */ > - suspend_enter(PM_SUSPEND_MEM); > - > + error = disable_nonboot_cpus(); > + if (!error) { > + /* Enter S3, system is already frozen */ > + suspend_enter(PM_SUSPEND_MEM); > + enable_nonboot_cpus(); > + } > /* Wake up devices */ > device_resume(); > } Do you consider this appropriate to 2.6.21?