From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934152AbXCVRur (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:50:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934158AbXCVRur (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:50:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:42354 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934152AbXCVRuq (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:50:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:50:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Dike Cc: LKML , uml-devel Subject: Re: [ PATCH 0/7 ] UML - Header cleanup Message-Id: <20070322095034.51a16aa5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070322160640.GA6992@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20070322160640.GA6992@c2.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:06:40 -0400 Jeff Dike wrote: > These are post-2.6.21 material, except that if the new definition of > ARRAY_SIZE goes to Linus, patch 1 in this series should go as well. I have the ARRAY_SIZE change queued for 2.6.22. It looks like the UML change needs to be folded into the same changeset to avoid build breaks?