From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934109AbXCVQ2d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:28:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934111AbXCVQ2d (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:28:33 -0400 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:53341 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934109AbXCVQ2c (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:28:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:28:27 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: David Woodhouse Cc: Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 Message-ID: <20070322162827.GA31143@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20070319205623.299d0378.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070320103151.f65c81b6.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070320192016.GC22797@outflux.net> <20070320214714.0e584cd4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070321115955.GA18195@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1174555020.20505.89.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070322114144.GA29453@uranus.ravnborg.org> <1174580753.20505.120.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1174580753.20505.120.camel@pmac.infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:25:53PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:41 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Yep - realized this when I took a closer look. > > One thing striked my mind. It is correct that new things gets added > > to i386 first these days? > > Personally I tend to do PowerPC first, but most others seem to do i386, > yes. There are still system calls being added to i386 and not x86_64... > > init/missing_syscalls.h:947:3: warning: #warning syscall getcpu not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:950:3: warning: #warning syscall epoll_pwait not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:953:3: warning: #warning syscall lutimesat not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:956:3: warning: #warning syscall revokeat not implemented > init/missing_syscalls.h:959:3: warning: #warning syscall frevoke not implemented > > > To me it looks like x86_64 is growing larger than i386 among the > > developers these days so using asm-x86_64/unistd.h could be a better > > choice? > > Or perhaps the union of i386, x86_64 and powerpc. But I think i386 is > good enough for now. I kept i386 as default so all is good. Sam