From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965469AbXC0V0F (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:26:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965445AbXC0V0E (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:26:04 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:36336 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965469AbXC0V0D (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:26:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:26:05 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Andrew Morton , ak@suse.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: 2.6.21-rc5-mm1: i386/x86_64 register_die_notifier() change Message-ID: <20070327212605.GE16477@stusta.de> References: <20070326205706.a750bb35.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070326205706.a750bb35.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:57:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.21-rc4-mm1: >... > +move-die-notifier-handling-to-common-code.patch >... > Misc >... Is the removal of the vmalloc_sync_all() call in register_die_notifier() on i386 and x86_64 both intentional and correct? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed