From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965693AbXC1TjE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:39:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752680AbXC1TjE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:39:04 -0400 Received: from smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.209]:33929 "HELO smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752701AbXC1TjB (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:39:01 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=cXpRwf6FreA614c571c2TWoKgtT0Sv5tjR8Nn7WaiJxAX0NDxcofFRe6CAp8/H9nCfkKI4Z+gV7SkRWlx8tTY3IwfOhVt79iqxjUP+MnaciGYwAywleRv2urumLAlzmDJnVeqTUULaA+sP4cCFAMDtKR6wElICey8zTox39PBbY= ; X-YMail-OSG: EyzL7TkVM1mBPJSZgd.dq4DNW6.K0RvKP1JrAYtbaLkNRgDphOXvqhmF8ckDLIBukK6joemejg-- From: David Brownell To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [3/6] 2.6.21-rc4: known regressions Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:38:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Maxim , Jeff Chua , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Jens Axboe , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Thomas Gleixner , jgarzik@pobox.com, Andrew Morton References: <200703281701.23876.maximlevitsky@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703281238.57811.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 March 2007 9:38 am, Linus Torvalds wrote: > It's a *device*, dammit. It should save and resume like one (probably as a > system device). The "set_mode()" etc stuff is at a completely different > (higher) conceptual level. Agreed, except about "probably as a system device". Last I checked, there was no good reason to use sysdev suspend()/resume() rather than platform_device suspend_late()/early_resume(). Which more or less means no good reason to use sysdev in new code... Also, making HPET use the legacy mode seems like a step backwards. - Dave