From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965692AbXC1TKs (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:10:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965695AbXC1TJA (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:09:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:45128 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965694AbXC1TIm (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:08:42 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:03:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Virtualization Mailing List , Jan Beulich , Stephane Eranian , Ingo Molnar , "Randy.Dunlap" References: <46099709.2000304@goop.org> In-Reply-To: <46099709.2000304@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703282103.50191.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 March 2007 00:13, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete > duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by > implementing them in terms of the more general > smp_call_function_mask(). I think I got those already. -Andi