From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934347AbXC2VrE (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:47:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934354AbXC2VrD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:47:03 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:55385 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934355AbXC2VrB (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:47:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20070329.144652.95503764.davem@davemloft.net> To: jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: your mail From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jan Engelhardt Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:42:17 +0200 (MEST) > > unsubscribe linux-kernel .. > > I wonder why people can't send their unsubscribe message to the same > address they sent their subscribe message to. People get frustrated that it doesn't work then start doing stupid things like sending it to the actual list, like this person did. Of course they always fail to consider doing the proper thing which is to ask postmaster@vger.kernel.org or the list owner (linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org in this case) for help if it is the case that their email has changed and they no longer have a way to send from the subscribed address.