From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>, Oliver Joa <oliver@j-o-a.de>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Corrupt XFS -Filesystems on new Hardware and Kernel
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:14:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070329111407.GA9959@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070329093400.GB14616@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Thu, Mar 29 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Oliver Joa wrote:
> > >>eason or another, xfs has detected a corrupted on-disk inode format
> > >>which it cannot recognize, and shuts down.
> > ----
> > Oh, one other thing that may not apply in your case, but may.
> > Does your SATA disk support write caching? Does it support
> > something called a barrier function? (not real clear on all
> > the ways this can go wrong, but I believe barriers are supposed
> > to guarantee previous data has been fixed on disk (not in write
> > cache). If the SATA controller issues a reset, it may very well
> > purge the write cache. Theoretically, I can think of a _possibility_,
> > that the reset disk would purge the write cache and the barrier
> > indicator would tell xfs to resume writing. From a recent thread
> > on the xfs list, it would appear this could be a "bad" thing (like
> > crossing the streams ala "ghostbusters", but in a data-integrity
> > context).
> As far as I can remember, barrier does not mean that data is fixed on
> disk. It is only a command that forces all the writes before the barrier
> to be performed before all the writes after the barrier. So this is more
> an ordering restriction than a data integrity thing...
A barrier write guarentees both data before barrier is on disk, as well
as the barrier itself when completion is signalled.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-29 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-27 16:16 Corrupt XFS -Filesystems on new Hardware and Kernel Oliver Joa
2007-03-27 19:13 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2007-03-28 7:46 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 9:30 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-03-28 10:59 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 11:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-03-28 11:31 ` David Chinner
2007-03-28 12:42 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-28 14:56 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-03-28 19:56 ` Oliver Joa
2007-03-29 0:21 ` Linda Walsh
2007-03-29 2:34 ` Linda Walsh
2007-03-29 9:34 ` Jan Kara
2007-03-29 11:14 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2007-03-28 23:46 ` David Chinner
2007-03-30 13:45 ` Oliver Joa
2007-04-11 7:36 ` Oliver Joa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070329111407.GA9959@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=oliver@j-o-a.de \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox