Re: Ten percent test

Gene Heskett
2007-04-09T13:02:08Z

On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 00:08 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> >Actually, there was practically nil interest in testing. We made a
>> >couple of minor adjustments to the interactivity logic, and all went
>> >quiet, so I didn't think it was enough of a problem to require more
>> >intrusive countermeasures.
>> >
>> > -Mike
>>
>> Does one of these messages have a url so I can test the latest of your
>> patches for -rc6? Or was the one Ingo sent the most recent?
>
>No, my tree has a bugfix and some other adjustments that try to move the
>balance closer to fair without sacrificing interactivity.
>
>> Putting that url in your sig would be nice, and might result in its
>> getting a lot more exersize which should = more feedback.
>
>When I get it cleaned up and better tested, I'll post again. If you
>want, I'll CC you... willing victims are a highly valued commodity :)
>
> -Mike

:) Put me on that list, Mike.

--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The box said "Requires Windows 95 or better." I can't understand
why it won't work on my Linux computer.