Re: Ten percent test

Mike Galbraith
2007-04-09T05:59:43Z

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 00:08 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> >
> >Actually, there was practically nil interest in testing. We made a
> >couple of minor adjustments to the interactivity logic, and all went
> >quiet, so I didn't think it was enough of a problem to require more
> >intrusive countermeasures.
> >
> > -Mike
>
> Does one of these messages have a url so I can test the latest of your
> patches for -rc6? Or was the one Ingo sent the most recent?

No, my tree has a bugfix and some other adjustments that try to move the
balance closer to fair without sacrificing interactivity.

> Putting that url in your sig would be nice, and might result in its
> getting a lot more exersize which should = more feedback.

When I get it cleaned up and better tested, I'll post again. If you
want, I'll CC you... willing victims are a highly valued commodity :)

-Mike