Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05T12:10:18Z

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> here's some test results, comparing SD-latest to Mike's-latest:
>
> re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
>
> - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!

Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can you
send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can take a
bit for the throttle to catch them all.

-Mike