Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

Mike Galbraith
2007-04-05T12:24:41Z

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 14:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> > >
> > > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> > > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!
> >
> > Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can
> > you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can
> > take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.
>
> ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes
> things out.

Ok, I didn't try 10 of them. It can still get a bit ragged here, so I
may have to latch the throttle for a bit to make sure they have to
maintain improved behavior to get unleashed. 5 of them get instantly
nailed, and stay nailed.

-Mike