Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest

Ingo Molnar
2007-04-05T12:13:01Z

* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:

> > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's:
> >
> > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect
> > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously!
>
> Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can
> you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can
> take a bit for the throttle to catch them all.

ah, indeed - i ran 10 of them and letting them run for a bit smoothes
things out.

Ingo