From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422678AbXC2WGv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:06:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422676AbXC2WGv (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:06:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:55885 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422672AbXC2WGu (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:06:50 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Andreas Mohr Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: add command line option "local_apic_timer_c2_ok" Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:06:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Mark Langsdorf , Len Brown , "Morrow, William" , "Crouse, Jordan" , Thomas Gleixner , Pavel Machek , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , Nick Piggin , Mingming Cao , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Piotrowski , Mariusz Kozlowski , Oliver Pinter , Sid Boyce , Nick Piggin , Jens Axboe , Thomas Renninger References: <20070329214520.GA3185@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070329214520.GA3185@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703300006.24960.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 March 2007 23:45, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:16:54PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > > > Here's a patch. I don't have a system with C1E, so i only tested that > > > the apic timer still works on a older AMD box. > > > > I think this looks better than what we have now, but it would look even > > better if the core CPUID stuff was in arch/i386/kernel/cpu/amd.c, and we > > simply had X86_FEATURE_BROKEN_C1_LAPIC etc.. > > Please don't, this would break the interface logically. We already have several of those. And negative is much easier. -Andi