From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964769AbXC3KMM (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:12:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964813AbXC3KMM (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:12:12 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:3755 "EHLO mail.muc.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964769AbXC3KML (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:12:11 -0400 Date: 30 Mar 2007 12:12:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:12:09 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Gerd Hoffmann , Alan , Ingo Molnar , lkml - Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use X86_EFLAGS_IF in x86-64/irqflags.h. Message-ID: <20070330101209.GA79904@muc.de> References: <1175154408.12230.195.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070329103602.GB52274@muc.de> <1175166417.12230.206.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070329121958.GA35584@muc.de> <1175224343.12230.368.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1175224343.12230.368.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:12:23PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:19 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:06:57PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > [SNIP: processor-flags.h patch for i386 ] > > > Ok. Can you do it for x86-64 too? > > OK, here it is. Compiles, but -rc5-mm2 doesn't link for me on x86-64 at > the moment. What's the problem? > > Something seems quite wrong with CONFIG_X86_VSMP. AFAICT (1 << 18) is > the "alignment check" flag, not the "virtual interrupt" flag which I > expected. They abuse that intentionally as a way to talk to their hypervisor. You don't want to know details. -Andi