From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm3
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:31:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703302131.23469.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070330103958.16b738aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>
> BUG: NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0, eip c014ce9c, registers:
I suspect it is just because his console is too slow and then unwinding
took too long and it happened to hit the unwinder.
You did use a slow console, right?
I suppose it just needs a strategic touch_nmi_watchdog. Will add that.
> Modules linked in: ide_cd cdrom rtc unix
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c014ce9c>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00000093 (2.6.21-rc5-mm3 #10)
> EIP is at read_pointer+0x49/0x2d8
> eax: c7a8dd04 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000000 edx: c043d19c
> esi: c043d184 edi: c043d19c ebp: c7a8dbf4 esp: c7a8dbbc
> ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
> Process udevd (pid: 864, ti=c7a8c000 task=c97cd4d0 task.ti=c7a8c000)
> Stack: 0000000b c7a8dc70 c7a8dbf4 c014d6d0 c7a8dd04 c043e454 c7a8dbf4 c011fdd1
> c043e404 c043e454 c043d190 0005cd94 c043d184 c7a8dd04 c7a8dd14 c014dd3a
> 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c7a8df44 c7a8dd74 c741eefb 00000008
> Call Trace:
> [<c014dd3a>] unwind+0x414/0xfa2
> [<c010510d>] dump_trace_unwind+0xb4/0xe5
> [<c014ce4d>] unwind_init_running+0x25/0x2b
> [<c01051a1>] dump_trace+0x63/0x1eb
> [<c010ad39>] save_stack_trace+0x23/0x42
> [<c01393c9>] update_cpu_base_expires_next+0x56/0x5a
> [<c013a475>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x17c/0x1b8
> [<c0115e8e>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x85
> [<c0104bef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x33/0x38
> [<c014320c>] lock_release+0x1d2/0x1da
> [<c013a7ef>] up_read+0x19/0x2e
> [<c011b800>] do_page_fault+0x28f/0x55b
> [<c034d191>] error_code+0x79/0x80
> [<c020c23e>] __put_user_4+0x12/0x18
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at __put_user_4+0x12/0x18
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
> [<c01040d6>] ret_from_fork+0x6/0x1c
Hmpf. I saw it once in child_rip here too. Then I wanted to reproduce it to report
properly and couldn't again. I had a few other backtraces that were all non stuck
with child_rip then on essentially the same kernel. Something weird is going on.
> [<c013a475>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x17c/0x1b8
> [<c0115e8e>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x85
> [<c0104bef>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x33/0x38
> [<c020c184>] __get_user_4+0x14/0x17
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at __get_user_4+0x14/0x17
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
Now that is weird. Never seen before. Jan, any ideas?
What is your gcc/compiler, Michal?
-Andi
Were there any strange binutils in use, Michal?
> [<c018b42f>] do_execve+0xdd/0x210
> [<c0102497>] sys_execve+0x3f/0x62
> [<c01041c2>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070330103958.16b738aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-03-30 19:31 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-03-31 9:11 ` Fw: Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm3 Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 11:19 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-31 13:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-04-02 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703302131.23469.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox