From: Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@gmail.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
"David M. Lloyd" <dmlloyd@flurg.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] signalfd v2 - signalfd core ...
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703310124.22082.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703080919541.10832@woody.linux-foundation.org>
On Thursday 08 March 2007 18:28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The sad part is that there really is no reason why the BSD crowd couldn't
> have done recvmsg() as an "extended read with per-system call flags",
> which would have made things like O_NONBLOCK etc unnecessary, because you
> could do it just with MSG_DONTWAIT..
Wait a second here... O_NONBLOCK is not just unnecessary - it's buggy!
Try to do nonblocking read from stdin (fd #0) -
* setting O_NONBLOCK with fcntl will set it for all other processes
which has the same stdin!
* trying to reset O_NONBLOCK after the read doesn't help (think kill -9)
* duping fd #0 doesn't help because O_NONBLOCK is not per-fd,
it's shared just like filepos.
I really like that trick with recvmsg + MSG_DONTWAIT instead.
--
vda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 1:21 [patch 2/5] signalfd v2 - signalfd core Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 14:31 ` David M. Lloyd
2007-03-08 15:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 16:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 16:40 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-08 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 20:53 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-30 23:24 ` Denis Vlasenko [this message]
2007-03-08 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 19:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 19:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 20:48 ` Marko Macek
2007-03-08 21:03 ` Marko Macek
2007-03-09 20:22 ` Kent Overstreet
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-08 19:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 23:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-09 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-09 21:33 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-03-08 20:43 Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-08 21:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 21:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-08 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 22:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 23:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-09 0:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-09 1:16 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703310124.22082.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=dmlloyd@flurg.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=medwards.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox