From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1752717AbXCaKFu@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752717AbXCaKFu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:05:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752791AbXCaKFt
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:05:49 -0400
Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:53182 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752717AbXCaKFt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:05:49 -0400
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:05:43 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Xenofon Antidides <xantidides@yahoo.gr>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
       linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL
Message-ID: <20070331100543.GA13031@elte.hu>
References: <1175322706.6030.20.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070331092857.12651.qmail@web26704.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070331092857.12651.qmail@web26704.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3
	-2.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Xenofon,

could you tell us a bit more about the specs of your system? What CPU 
speed for example? (i suspect it's a single-CPU box, right?)

	Ingo