public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: dtor@insightbb.com, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stuart_hayes@dell.com,
	zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: usb hid: reset NumLock
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 22:24:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070401222410.2ff7ecd7.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703312122100.6040@jikos.suse.cz>

On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:35:19 +0200 (CEST), Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:

> I think I see an issue here. Imagine that you boot a system initially with 
> one keyboard connected (usb, ps/2, doesn't matter), and after some time 
> you connect second USB keyboard (the NumLock is 'on' on the first keyboard 
> when you connect the second one).

OK. I toyed with a return to the Stuart's idea: defeat filtering
somehow, but it wasn't working well, too much duplication. So, I created
a clone of hidinput_find_field() instead. It's still an annoying
duplication, but a lesser one, I think.

diff --git a/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c b/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
index ef09952..7338e81 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
@@ -548,6 +548,28 @@ void usbhid_init_reports(struct hid_device *hid)
 		warn("timeout initializing reports");
 }
 
+/*
+ * Reset LEDs which BIOS might have left on.
+ */
+static int hid_find_field_early(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int page,
+    unsigned int hid_code, struct hid_field **field);
+
+static void usbhid_set_leds(struct hid_device *hid)
+{
+	struct hid_field *field;
+	int offset;
+
+	/*
+	 * Just reset Num Lock for now.
+	 * This is called for non-keyboard devices too, so no printk if field
+	 * is not found.
+	 */
+	if ((offset = hid_find_field_early(hid, HID_UP_LED, 0x01, &field)) != -1) {
+		hid_set_field(field, offset, 0);
+		usbhid_submit_report(hid, field->report, USB_DIR_OUT);
+	}
+}
+
 #define USB_VENDOR_ID_GTCO		0x078c
 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_GTCO_90		0x0090
 #define USB_DEVICE_ID_GTCO_100		0x0100
@@ -971,6 +993,30 @@ static void hid_find_max_report(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int type, int *
 	}
 }
 
+static int hid_find_field_early(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned int page,
+    unsigned int hid_code, struct hid_field **pfield)
+{
+	struct hid_report *report;
+	struct hid_field *field;
+	struct hid_usage *usage;
+	int i, j;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(report, &hid->report_enum[HID_OUTPUT_REPORT].report_list, list) {
+		for (i = 0; i < report->maxfield; i++) {
+			field = report->field[i];
+			for (j = 0; j < field->maxusage; j++) {
+				usage = &field->usage[j];
+				if ((usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) == page &&
+				    (usage->hid & 0xFFFF) == hid_code) {
+					*pfield = field;
+					return j;
+				}
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	return -1;
+}
+
 static int hid_alloc_buffers(struct usb_device *dev, struct hid_device *hid)
 {
 	struct usbhid_device *usbhid = hid->driver_data;
@@ -1314,6 +1360,8 @@ static int hid_probe(struct usb_interface *intf, const struct usb_device_id *id)
 
 	usbhid_init_reports(hid);
 	hid_dump_device(hid);
+	/* if (hid->quirks & HID_QUIRK_RESET_LEDS) */
+	usbhid_set_leds(hid);
 
 	if (!hidinput_connect(hid))
 		hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_INPUT;
diff --git a/include/linux/hid.h b/include/linux/hid.h
index d26b08f..f592f01 100644
--- a/include/linux/hid.h
+++ b/include/linux/hid.h
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct hid_item {
 #define HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORTS		0x00020000
 #define HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE			0x00040000
 #define HID_QUIRK_SONY_PS3_CONTROLLER		0x00080000
+#define HID_QUIRK_RESET_LEDS			0x00100000
 
 /*
  * This is the global environment of the parser. This information is

> > +++ b/include/linux/hid.h
> > @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct hid_item {
> >  #define HID_QUIRK_SKIP_OUTPUT_REPORTS		0x00020000
> >  #define HID_QUIRK_IGNORE_MOUSE			0x00040000
> >  #define HID_QUIRK_SONY_PS3_CONTROLLER		0x00080000
> > +#define HID_QUIRK_RESET_LEDS			0x00100000
> 
> I think this is not worth a quirk - when we get it working properly, why 
> not do it unconditionally for all keyboards?

The main reason is, I have a USB-to-PS/2 adapter where early acces to
LEDs does not work. Apparently, it is still initializing the PS/2 part
when it reports to USB that it's ready, and needs a delay. So, I figured
that I may be breaking some odd devices. Some may crash or whatnot.
This is why I asked Stuart to get me VID/PID for involved keyboards.

> > URL with details, discussion, rejected patch to read BIOS byte at 0x417:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228674
> 
> "You are not authorized to access bug #228674. To see this bug, you must 
> first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions." 

Sorry. I missed that the bug has access flags set...

-- Pete

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-02  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-30 17:59 usb hid: reset NumLock Pete Zaitcev
2007-03-30 18:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-30 19:54   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-03-30 20:29     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-31 19:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-03-31 22:43   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-02  5:24   ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2007-04-02 14:48     ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-02 23:12       ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-03  5:04         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-03  6:24           ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-03  8:52         ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-03  8:57           ` [linux-usb-devel] " Robert Marquardt
2007-04-03  9:32             ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-05  3:24           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-05  8:50             ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-05 20:38               ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-05 20:54                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-05 21:22                   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-01 11:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-01 16:16   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-02  4:10   ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070401222410.2ff7ecd7.zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --cc=dtor@insightbb.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stuart_hayes@dell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox