public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dave Sperry <dave_sperry@ieee.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:37:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070402093740.GA10091@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4610BC15.5030800@ieee.org>


* Dave Sperry <dave_sperry@ieee.org> wrote:

> I checked the clock source and in both the vanilla and rt cases and 
> they were both acpi_pm

ok, thanks for double-checking that.

> Here's the oprofile for my vanilla case:

i tried your workload and i think i managed to optimize it some more: i 
have uploaded the -rt8 kernel with these improvements included - could 
you try it? Is there any measurable improvement relative to -rt5?

one more thing to improve netperf performance is to do this before 
running it:

  chrt -f -p 50 $$

this will put netperf on the same priority level as the net hardirq and 
the net softirq (which both default to SCHED_FIFO:50), and should result 
in a (much) reduced context-switch rate.

Or, if networking is not latency-critical, then you could move the net 
hardirq and softirq threads to SCHED_BATCH, and run netperf under 
SCHED_BATCH as well, using:

  chrt -b -p 0 $$

and figuring out the active softirq hardirq thread PIDs and "chrt -b" 
-ing them too.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-02  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-01 19:15 Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5 Dave Sperry
2007-04-01 20:07 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2007-04-01 22:00   ` Dave Sperry
2007-04-02  5:55   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  6:30     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02  8:17   ` Dave Sperry
2007-04-02  9:37     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-02 14:09 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 14:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-02 17:17 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 17:50 dave_sperry@ieee.org
2007-04-02 19:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03  0:09   ` David Sperry
2007-04-03  6:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-03  8:51     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070402093740.GA10091@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=dave_sperry@ieee.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox