From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86_64: enable clockevents and dynticks
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:39:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070402213949.GD10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175549504.28263.184.camel@localhost.localdomain>
* Thomas Gleixner (tglx@linutronix.de) wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 11:54 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > * Thomas Gleixner (tglx@linutronix.de) wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > > This series converts x86_64 timers to clockevents drivers
> > > > and then enables dynticks. There's some minor cleanups along
> > > > the way. The lapic broadcast mechanism is untested, I'm sure it
> > > > still needs work, there's still some cruft in lapic_setup_timer.
> > > >
> > > > This is just for comments at this point, now that it's working
> > > > on my test box in both NO_HZ=n and NO_HZ=n configurations (typically
> > > > using hpet).
> > >
> > > Have you checked, if we could share the code between i386 and x86_64 at
> > > least for PIT and HPET. I'm not sure about the local APIC, but I think
> > > it might be doable as well.
> >
> > Yes, that's part of why I did some of the cleanups that way, so that we
> > could merge the two together later.
>
> I'd prefer to get this done now. If we plug it in as is, the "merge
> later" probably will never happen.
that's fine, this is just RFC to see if there's obvious broken bits, etc.
also, i still need to do some split out of the pit. it and hpet are nearly
identical though, so i don't noticing any issues with this.
the part i know is broken is lapic broadcast, so i'd like to fix that
up too. trouble is, it's broken on vanilla too, so i'm not 100% sure
what i'm debugging yet.
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-02 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-31 8:31 [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86_64: enable clockevents and dynticks Chris Wright
2007-03-31 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] x86_64: untangle asm/hpet.h from asm/timex.h Chris Wright
2007-03-31 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] x86_64: drive set_rtc_mss from standalone timer Chris Wright
2007-03-31 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] x86_64: clockevents drivers Chris Wright
2007-03-31 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86_64: prep idle loop for dynticks Chris Wright
2007-03-31 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86_64: enable dynticks Chris Wright
2007-03-31 9:23 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] x86_64: enable clockevents and dynticks Ingo Molnar
2007-03-31 16:36 ` Chris Wright
2007-03-31 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-01 9:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-01 18:54 ` Chris Wright
2007-04-02 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-02 21:39 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2007-04-02 21:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-02 22:17 ` Chris Wright
2007-04-01 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-02 7:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070402213949.GD10574@sequoia.sous-sol.org \
--to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox