From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992895AbXDDNGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:06:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992896AbXDDNGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:06:16 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:48064 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992895AbXDDNGP (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:06:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:05:59 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Linux Memory Management List , tee@sgi.com, holt@sgi.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [rfc] no ZERO_PAGE? Message-ID: <20070404130559.GD19587@v2.random> References: <20070329075805.GA6852@wotan.suse.de> <20070330024048.GG19407@wotan.suse.de> <20070404033726.GE18507@wotan.suse.de> <20070404102407.GA529@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > I'm confused. CONFIG_ZERO_PAGE off is where we'd like to end up: how > would turning CONFIG_ZERO_PAGE on in -rc kernels help us to get there? He most certainly meant on by default. I think if we do this, we also need a zeropage counter in the vm stats so that we'll get a measure of the waste and it'll be possible to identify apps to optimize/fix.