From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751559AbXDDVEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:04:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751545AbXDDVEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:04:25 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:56331 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751477AbXDDVEX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 17:04:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:04:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: john stultz Cc: lkml , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] fix jiffies clocksource inittime Message-Id: <20070404140404.3daa910b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1175720027.17711.69.camel@localhost> References: <1175716216.17711.59.camel@localhost> <20070404134310.12ad3ab8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1175720027.17711.69.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 13:53:47 -0700 john stultz wrote: > > An option would be to test it in 2.6.22-rcX for a while, then backport to > > 2.6.21.x. > > I'm fine with this (also getting it into the next -mm would help). But > I'd defer to others with stronger opinions. No, I wouldn't wait around for -mm testing in a case like this. Generally, if we plan on getting a patch into 2.6.x this late in the cycle, I will slam it in asap so it gets as much testing as possible. Oh well, fingers crossed - I'll add it to today's batch.