Re: [PATCH 0/90] Post 2.6.21 OMAP update

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> [070404 14:37]:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:27:30 -0400 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [070404 14:02]:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Attached is a rather large OMAP update for post 2.6.21.
> > > 
> > > OMAP is a series of ARM processors from Texas Instruments
> > > used in various cell phones and PDAs.
> > > 
> > > The patch series is based on code that has been brewing
> > > in the linux-omap tree since last fall.
> > > 
> > > We'd like to switch the linux-omap tree to use the mainline
> > > tree for core omap stuff, and this series attemps to do it
> > > for most part. 
> > > 
> > > As the patch series is big, Andrew Morton asked me to post
> > > it to LKML instead of linux-arm-kernel list for a wider review,
> > > so please comment on the patches if you have a chance!
> > > 
> > > The patches touch only omap specific code at:
> > > 
> > > arch/arm/Kconfig
> > > arch/arm/plat-omap
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap1
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2
> > > include/asm-arm/arch-omap
> > 
> > Looks like using git-send-email --chain-reply-to with this many
> > messages is not a good idea... The threading gets nested too wide :)
> 
> That's only a problem when there are <too many> patches to be
> reviewed.  Hence, do more frequent postings of fewer patches per series.
> That will likely also get you more reviewers.

Yeah, I agree.. We've already missed two merge windows because of the
large patch set :( The problem is that patch set just keeps growing.

Things should be to normal small patch sets once this pile is dealt
with.

Regards,

Tony