From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751229AbXDDSpX (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752284AbXDDSpW (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:22 -0400 Received: from nlpi043.sbcis.sbc.com ([207.115.36.72]:50874 "EHLO nlpi043.sbcis.sbc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbXDDSpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:45:19 -0400 X-ORBL: [67.117.73.34] Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:44:57 -0400 From: Tony Lindgren To: Randy Dunlap Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/90] Post 2.6.21 OMAP update Message-ID: <20070404184455.GL29129@atomide.com> References: <11757088774110-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20070404182728.GK29129@atomide.com> <20070404113925.da221efc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070404113925.da221efc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Randy Dunlap [070404 14:37]: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:27:30 -0400 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Tony Lindgren [070404 14:02]: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Attached is a rather large OMAP update for post 2.6.21. > > > > > > OMAP is a series of ARM processors from Texas Instruments > > > used in various cell phones and PDAs. > > > > > > The patch series is based on code that has been brewing > > > in the linux-omap tree since last fall. > > > > > > We'd like to switch the linux-omap tree to use the mainline > > > tree for core omap stuff, and this series attemps to do it > > > for most part. > > > > > > As the patch series is big, Andrew Morton asked me to post > > > it to LKML instead of linux-arm-kernel list for a wider review, > > > so please comment on the patches if you have a chance! > > > > > > The patches touch only omap specific code at: > > > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig > > > arch/arm/plat-omap > > > arch/arm/mach-omap1 > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2 > > > include/asm-arm/arch-omap > > > > Looks like using git-send-email --chain-reply-to with this many > > messages is not a good idea... The threading gets nested too wide :) > > That's only a problem when there are patches to be > reviewed. Hence, do more frequent postings of fewer patches per series. > That will likely also get you more reviewers. Yeah, I agree.. We've already missed two merge windows because of the large patch set :( The problem is that patch set just keeps growing. Things should be to normal small patch sets once this pile is dealt with. Regards, Tony