From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161213AbXDEFl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:41:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161216AbXDEFl6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:41:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:46615 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161213AbXDEFl5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 01:41:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:41:52 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Randy Dunlap Cc: lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc/kernel-parameters: use IA-32 tag instead of i386 Message-Id: <20070404224152.29062e47.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070404220534.36cd24e9.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> References: <20070404220534.36cd24e9.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 22:05:34 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote: > Use documented tag for "IA-32" (not "i386") to indicate which > kernel parameters apply to IA-32. mv arch/i386 arch/ia32 ;) Seriously, is there any point in this? Kernel uses the i386 terminology and surely there's no confusion over what that represents.